High-Speed Rail

Two High-Speed Rail Proposals
A world-class, dedicated, high-speed rail service on the Northeast Corridor would transform what it means to travel in and throughout the Northeast Megaregion. Two creative proposals, one by the University of Pennsylvania and another by Amtrak, aim to connect major population and job centers via next generation passenger trains capable of reaching speeds in excess of 220 mph on new, dedicated tracks along the length of the corridor. Both proposals would reduce travel times to roughly half of Amtrak's current Acela service, and achieve greater frequency, reliability, and capacity than would ever be possible on the existing rail infrastructure. Both proposal also assume that the existing rail infrastructure would be upgraded and maintained as the true, high-speed rail system is implemented. However, the two proposals have contrasting visions in many areas, proposing different physical alignments, operational plans, and institutional and financial arrangements.



University of Pennsylvania - In 2010, a graduate studio at the University of Pennsylvania, School of Design, led by Bob Yaro, president of Regional Plan Association and chair of the Northeast Alliance, and Marilyn Jordan Taylor, dean of PennDesign, released a report that described what a high-speed rail system in the Northeast Corridor could look like. The proposed system would mainly utilize the existing rail rights-of-way from Washington, DC to New York. Then, recognizing that the current alignment between New York and New Haven currently operates at near 100 percent capacity and is hemmed in on all sides by dense, urban development, the proposed route extends eastward along Long Island to Ronkonkoma - MacArthur Airport before breaking north through a new tunnel under Long Island Sound to New Haven, CT. Again, here the line would diverge from the current alignment and travel north to Hartford, CT, and then northeast along a new inland route to Boston South Station.

The studio's final report was followed up by a second report in May 2011 that analyzed the project's economic benefits, recommended a new, institutional structure for building and managing the multi-state corridor, and considered several, innovative, public-private financing strategies.

A third report by the University of Pennsylvania studio, published in May 2012, identified an early action high-speed rail project between New York and Philadelphia. This project could accommodate frequent, reliable, 37-minute service in this segment while also adding new capacity for commuter rail services in the corridor.

Read more about this proposal in three posts on the Back on Track: Northeast Blog (first, second, third)

Download the full reports (first, second, third)




Amtrak - Released months after the PennDesign proposal, Amtrak's proposal also calls for major new tunnels in the cities of Baltimore, Philadelphia, and New York, and primarily uses the existing rail rights-of-way along the southern half of the corridor. North of New York, Amtrak's solution is to send the trains north through Westchester County and into western Connecticut along a route that takes advantage of existing highway alignments already under public ownership, including Interstates 84 and 91 in Connecticut, and Interstate 90 in Massachusetts. Like the PennDesign alignment, the route Amtrak studied would also bring intercity rail service to new areas that currently are either under-served or not served at all by Amtrak, for example the Connecticut cities of Danbury and Waterbury.

In 2012, Amtrak updated their vision for high-speed rail in the Northeast Corridor and integrating it with the Northeast Corridor Infrastructure Master Plan to create a single, comprehensive investment program for the entire corridor. The updated report also contained new ridership and cost projections.

Read more about these proposals (first, second)

Download the full reports (first, second)



Recent Entries

While the House and Senate's Fiscal Year 2014 Transportation, Housing and Urban Development Appropriations Bills differ in important ways (in fact, 10 billion ways), both are a far cry from the budget President Obama proposed back in April. The President's budget requested Congress provide the Federal Railroad Administration with nearly $12 billion to invest in passenger rail systems in fiscal year 2014. This would have been more than ten times the House's proposed funding levels and six times what the Senate proposed.

The President also requested $6.6 billion for a Rail Service Improvement Program that would "develop new key passenger rail corridors, substantially improve existing corridors [and] the Nation's freight network by adding capacity and removing bottlenecks." The House and Senate both proposed virtually nothing for the existing federal high-speed rail program or a new or modified program similar to what the President proposed.


FY2014-Rail-Approps.png

The Senate is planning on taking up their spending bill next week. While the Senate's bill still leaves a lot to be desired, it is far more acceptable than the House bill. Joe Boardman, Amtrak's President and CEO has said that the Senate bill is "realistic" and "workable," but also says that "even at this funding level, there is a significant amount of critical backlog infrastructure work that will not get done. In order for the nation's intercity passenger rail system to reach its full potential, Amtrak will need higher and sustained levels of federal capital funding."

Mr. Boardman said funding levels in the House bill put "every one of our services at risk," including the Northeast Corridor, which he called "bad for revenue, bad for the economy."

Take Action:
National Association of Railroad Passengers campaign:
Get Your Mayor to Tell Washington: We Need More Trains!

Members of the U.S. House of Representatives, Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure convened in New York City on Friday for a hearing about the importance of the Northeast Corridor. The hearing took place in the Farley Post Office, home of the future Moynihan Station. Rep. Jeff Denham (R-CA), chair of the Railroads Subcommittee, wielded the gavel while Rep. Bill Shuster (R-PA), chair of the full committee, participated along with Ranking Member Corrine Brown (D-FL) and Rep. Jerrold Nadler (D-NY). The witnesses included the President and CEO of Amtrak, Joe Boardman; Commissioner of New York State Department of Transportation, Joan McDonald; President of Drexel University, John Fry; and President of Regional Plan Association (RPA) and Chair of the Northeast Alliance for Rail (NEAR), Bob Yaro.

The impetus for the hearing is that the current federal rail bill, PRIIA, expires this fall and Congress will begin negotiating the next bill this summer. The next federal rail bill will authorize a five to six years worth of appropriations for the Federal Railroad Administration and Amtrak, and hence capital improvements to the Northeast Corridor (NEC). The FRA's High-Speed & Intercity Passenger Rail Program is a potential source of future funding for NEC improvements. After Florida Governor Rick Scott rejected $2.4 billion in federal high-speed rail funds in 2011, nearly $1 billion was redirected to the Northeast. Amtrak's federal funding for capital improvements is also largely dedicated to the NEC, where nearly 40% of their capital budget is spent.

In his testimony before the Committee, Bob Yaro outlined the main components of an improvement program that can be authorized in the reauthorization of the rail bill. RPA calls this program, "NEC Now." The NEC Now proposal addresses the corridor's highest-priority infrastructure needs: to remove bottlenecks, increase capacity, improve reliability and reduce travel times along the entire corridor. It also proposes funding for the construction of a high-speed bypass in New Jersey for express trains to overtake local trains on a segment with heavy NJ Transit commuter rail traffic, would cut trip times between New York and Philadelphia to well under an hour.

Download RPA's NEC Now Legislative Proposal & Infrastructure Program.

Download Bob Yaro's testimony as prepared.


NEAR-logo-Twitter.pngThe Business Alliance for Northeast Mobility has officially been renamed, The Northeast Alliance for Rail (NEAR). The new name more clearly describes the work that the coalition does - it is no longer just a business alliance, as many civic and planning groups are active members, and our advocacy work is now more focused on passenger rail investments in the Northeast Megaregion, as opposed to broader mobility. The Northeast Alliance's new acronym, "NEAR," speaks to the proximity created by investments in passenger rail that reduce trip times between major urban hubs, and the hope that these investments will be made in the near-term.

Please take a moment to like our new Facebook page, follow us on Twitter, and join our mailing list.

On Monday, Amtrak released an updated report on improving the Northeast Corridor that builds off of several years of planning work. The report, The Amtrak Vision for the Northeast Corridor (PDF), summarizes Amtrak's plans to upgrade the existing corridor and build a new high-speed rail alignment - concepts that were outlined in two previous reports published by Amtrak in 2010, The Northeast Corridor Infrastructure Master Plan and A Vision for High-Speed Rail in the Northeast Corridor. This new, updated report revises and integrates these two plans into a single, comprehensive investment program.

eurostar.jpgWhile high-speed rail has struggled to secure adequate financing in the U.S., in Britain, the government has given the green light to begin construction on the country's second bullet train. The U.K. government's decision to move forward with the controversial project offers important lessons as the U.S. pursues its own high-speed rail corridors in California and the Northeast.

ny-phi.pngThe first phase of a Northeast Corridor high-speed rail project should connect New York and Philadelphia, Bob Yaro, president of Regional Plan Association, told the audience at a forum on high-speed rail in Philadelphia on Wednesday.

High-speed rail would cut travel times to 34 minutes between New York Penn Station and a new, high-speed rail station in downtown Philadelphia at Market East. This new station would be strategically located at the center of the largest job cluster in the Greater Philadelphia region. This phase of the project would require two new dedicated tracks, new railroad cars, and new tunnels under the Hudson River west of Manhattan and under Center City Philadelphia.

Amtrak recently announced the creation of a new business line, or division, Northeast Corridor Infrastructure and Investment Development, that will be solely devoted to all of the funding, policy, and planning decisions specifically related to improving the existing rail infrastructure and the development of a world-class, high-speed rail service on the NEC. This new business line will consolidate all of Amtrak's current high-speed rail development efforts under this new division. The new business line will be headed up by Stephen Gardner, who was previously Amtrak Vice President of Policy and Development.

This summer, Amtrak released a new strategic plan that lays out the goals of the NEC Development business line. It will be responsible for managing all of the station assets, planning, designing, and engineering new infrastructure, coordinating maintenance and construction, managing and growing the current capacity, and controlling all dispatching services for all railroad operations on the Northeast Corridor. One of the divisions priorities will be to manage Amtrak's investments in high-speed rail technology on the Corridor.

amtrak_hsr_cover_250.jpgLast year, Amtrak published a vision document that broadly outlined its plans for developing a next generation high-speed rail service in the Northeast Corridor. These new, high-speed trains would be capable of moving Amtrak passengers between New York and Washington, DC in 96 minutes, and New York and Boston in 83 minutes. Both of these trips take over 3 hours by airplane and over 4 by car in good traffic. This vision plan estimated that it could take up to 30 years and cost $117 billion to implement this next generation service on the country's premier rail corridor.

Amtrak also announced that they would release an update to this plan by the end of the year, which is expected to include "new analysis of the conceptual alignment, ridership, revenue, operations and maintenance costs projections, and capital investment needs." It will also proposed a phased implementation plan that will include incremental upgrades to existing infrastructure, capacity improvements, and of course constructing new track, signal, and electrical infrastructure for the high-speed rail service.

Empire Corridor Project Map
empirecorridorRailMap.jpgIn September, the U.S. DOT reached an agreement with the New York State DOT, Amtrak, and CSX and released the $149.3 million that was awarded to make improvements to passenger rail service on the Empire Corridor. The funds will be used to upgrade service, reduce delays, and improve reliability on this corridor, which is used by several Amtrak routes, including the Empire Service, Lake Shore Limited, Maple Leaf, Adirondack, and Ethan Allen Express.

These funds represent two ARRA grants that were awarded through the FRA's High-Speed Intercity Passenger Rail Program:

1) Empire Corridor Capacity Improvements - $58.1 million
These funds will be used by NYSDOT for final design and construction of the three interrelated upgrades to the Empire Corridor around the Albany-Rensselaer and Schenectady stations. A fourth track will be constructed at the Albany-Rensselaer station to relieve one of the most significant bottlenecks on the corridor. Tracks and turnouts at this station will also be upgraded and realigned to improve reliability, and signal wires on the Hudson Line will be relocated. Finally, Schenectady Station will be completely replaced as part of a broader, downtown revitalization
program.

2) Empire Corridor South: Albany to Schenectady 2nd Track - $91.2 million
NYSDOT will use these funds to add a second mainline track between Albany-Rensselaer and Schenectady stations, where there is currently only one track. This 17-mile stretch, along with several interlockings, represents a significant bottleneck on the corridor. If a train approaches while another train is using the rail line in the opposing direction, it can be forced to wait for up to 26 minutes for the line to clear. NYSDOT will also upgrade existing warning signs, automatic flashers, gates and predictors at grade crossings along this segment of the corridor.


View Empire Corridor HSIPR Projects in a larger map

Both of these grants and their associated improvements will allow for increased speeds and reduced trip times, and improved reliability along the corridor. Reconstructing Schenectady Station will also improve transit and pedestrian connectivity in downtown Schenectady. Construction on all of these projects is expected to begin next summer.

"These unprecedented investments, using American made materials, will improve passenger travel while creating good-paying jobs," said U.S. DOT Secretary Ray LaHood in a press release Friday. "President Obama's bold vision for passenger rail will change transportation in New York and the United States, helping relieve congestion on our roadways and reducing our dependence on foreign oil."


Images: NYS DOT

A coalition of business and civic leaders committed to improving passenger rail in the Northeast.
Join the Alliance

Chair

Leadership Council

  • AECOM
  • HNTB
  • The Northeast MAGLEV
  • STV

Members

  • 1000 Friends of Connecticut
  • A Better City
  • American Institute of Architects, New York Chapter
  • The Boston Foundation
  • The Business Council of Fairfield County
  • The Business Council of New York State
  • The BWI Business Partnership
  • Capital Real Estate Group
  • Capitol Region Council of Governments
  • Center City District
  • CenterState CEO
  • Central Connecticut Regional Planning Agency
  • Central Maryland Transportation Alliance
  • Central Philadelphia Development Corporation
  • Central Rhode Island Chamber of Commerce
  • CEO Council for Growth
  • Chesapeake Crescent Initiative
  • Citi
  • Connecticut Economic Resources Center
  • Connecticut Technology Council
  • Delaware State Chamber of Commerce
  • Destination DC
  • The Durst Organization
  • Econsult Corporation
  • Edison Properties
  • General Contractors Association of New York
  • Greater Baltimore Committee
  • Greater Philadelphia Chamber of Commerce
  • Greater Providence Chamber of Commerce
  • Greater Washington Board of Trade
  • H2L2
  • Jacobs Engineering
  • Langan Engineering & Environmental Services
  • Mercer Regional Chamber of Commerce
  • Metro Hartford Alliance
  • Middlesex County Regional Chamber of Commerce
  • New Castle County Chamber of Commerce
  • New Jersey State Chamber of Commerce
  • New York Water Taxi
  • Newark Regional Business Partnership
  • Parsons Brinckerhoff
  • PenTrans
  • Philadelphia Convention and Visitors Bureau
  • Pioneer Valley Planning Commission
  • PlanSmart NJ
  • Providence-Warwick Convention and Visitors Bureau
  • Select Greater Philadelphia
  • Stamford Urban Redevelopment Commission
  • Staten Island Chamber of Commerce
  • TranSystems
  • Vornado Realty Trust
  • Wallace Roberts & Todd

Join our mailing list

* indicates required